National Cancer Institute   Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program   Developing Cancer Therapies
CTEP HomeContactHelpSearch:

Investigator's Handbook
A Manual for Participants in Clinical Trials of Investigational Agents Sponsored by DCTD, NCI
Table of
Contents
Part A
1 2 3
Part B
4 5 6
Part C
7 8 9 10 11
Part D
12 13 14 15 16
Part E
17 18 19
Appendices

Part C: The Planning and Execution of a Clinical Trial

The following five sections provide a detailed description of the responsibilities of the investigator for the implementation of a clinical trial, from the drafting of the protocol to completion of the study. They are intended to guide both the protocol chair and the participating investigator and outline NCI policies on the responsibilities of each in the execution of a clinical trial.

  1. The Drafting of a Protocol
  2. Protocol Review and Approval at CTEP
  3. Ordering Investigational Agents from NCI
  4. Responsibility for Reporting Results to CTEP
  5. Adverse Events




7. The Drafting of a Protocol


The Planning and Execution of a Clinical Trial

The following five sections provide a detailed description of the responsibilities of the investigator for the implementation of a clinical trial, from the drafting of the protocol to completion of the study. They are intended to guide both the protocol chair and the participating investigator and outline NCI policies on the responsibilities of each in the execution of a clinical trial.


7. The Drafting of a Protocol

A protocol is the detailed written plan of a clinical experiment. This section details the essential features of a protocol. Careful attention to the following material will expedite the review of your protocol by CTEP.


7.1 Title Page

The face sheet of the protocol is the primary source of identifying information for the Protocol and Information Office (PIO) of CTEP, for the agent distribution system, for the IND file at the FDA, and for the listing of the protocol in the Physician Data Query (PDQ) system. Each protocol submitted to CTEP, therefore, must have a title page or face sheet that contains the following items:

  • Date of document
  • Local protocol number (i.e., institution or group number)
  • Title of study
  • A single protocol chair who will be responsible for the study, including his or her name, institution/Cooperative Group, address, phone and fax numbers, and e-mail address (A trainee may not be protocol chair-see Section 12.2.2)
  • Full name of institution/Group submitting the study
  • List of each participating institution/Group, and
  • For DCTD-supplied IND agents, a listing of each agent by name and NSC number.
  • Cooperative Groups may summarize by specifying "all Group members" or "restricted to…" and list institutions.
  • Protocols from sources other than the Cooperative Groups should specify each institution or site participating in the study, together with a responsible physician, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address at each site.


7.2.1 Schema

All treatment studies should include a brief schema depicting the treatment regimen(s).


7.2.2 Objective(s)

The objectives should be stated clearly. They generally should be stated as hypotheses to be tested. The study design should be capable of answering the questions posed by the objectives. The statistical section should clearly state how the data will be analyzed in relation to each of the objectives. The hypotheses to be tested in ancillary studies also must be clearly stated, and the statistical section should address analyses of the data in relation to these hypotheses.


7.2.3 Background and Rationale

Sufficient background information should be included so that the rationale for the study is clear. Any unpublished data relevant to the rationale should be included in either this section, or, if extensive, as an appendix to the protocol submission. In addition to the background and rationale included for therapeutic aspects of a study, information should be provided to support ancillary studies to be performed. The rationale should be clearly stated for studying particular correlations between tumor characteristics and outcome measurements (response to therapy, disease-free survival, overall survival, etc.). The choice of the particular techniques to be used should also be justified.


7.2.4 Patient Eligibility Criteria

The issues here have been discussed previously (Sections 4.1.3 and 5.1.2.2). Studies with objective response as an endpoint should include clear statements specifying whether tumor sites to be followed for response must be measurable, what criteria must be fulfilled to consider disease measurable, whether evaluable disease is permitted, and if so, at what sites. For ancillary studies, this section should include information regarding the choice of tumor sampling technique. For example, will aspiration biopsies be sufficient, or will surgical samples be required? How much tissue will be needed? What measures will be imposed to assure that the histopathologic diagnosis is not compromised? How will issues of tumor heterogeneity be addressed? What biases may be introduced by the sampling techniques and the amount of tissue required for the studies proposed?


7.2.5 Pharmaceutical Information

A separate pharmaceutical section is required for each agent. The content of the pharmaceutical section is dependent on whether the agent is investigational or commercial.


7.2.5.1 Investigational Agent Pharmaceutical Section
This section should include the following:

  • Product Description-Include the available dosage forms, ingredients, and packaging as appropriate. Also state the agent's supplier. For investigational agents sponsored by the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, the supplier will be NCI.
  • Solution Preparation (how the dose is to be prepared)-Include reconstitution directions and directions for further dilution if appropriate.
  • Storage Requirements-Include the requirements for the original dosage form, reconstituted solution and final diluted product, as applicable.
  • Stability-Include the stability of the original dosage form, reconstituted solution and final diluted product, as applicable.
  • Route of Administration-Include a description of the method to be used and the rate of administration if applicable. For example, continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours, short intravenous infusion over 30 to 60 minutes, intravenous bolus, etc. Describe any precautions required for safe administration.
  • Adverse Events - Include a description of the Reported Adverse Events and Potential Risks. For investigational agents the investigator should refer to the pharmaceutical data sheet for the agent or the appropriate Investigator's Brochure.


7.2.5.2 Commercial Agent Pharmaceutical Section
This section should include the following:

  • Product description: State the agent's supplier, i.e., commercially available.
  • Preparation (how the dose is to be prepared): Investigators may refer the reader to the package insert for 'standard' preparation instructions. If the agent is to be prepared by 'non-standard' or protocol-specific fashion, the reconstitution directions and instructions for further dilution must be included. Appropriate storage and stability information should be included to support the method of preparation.
  • Route of administration: Briefly describe how the agent will be administered. For example, continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours, short intravenous infusion over 30 to 60 minutes, intravenous bolus, etc.
  • Adverse Events: The investigator may refer the reader to the agent's package insert. Note: The Informed Consent document should contain a list of all expected adverse events that the patient is likely to experience. All adverse events should be written in laymen's terms.


7.2.6 Treatment Plan

Describe the protocol treatment clearly so it can be followed by all staff involved in the treatment of patients and in the conduct of the study. See Appendix XVI, Guidelines for Treatment Regimens: Expression and Nomenclature.


7.2.7 Procedures for Patient Entry on Study

Procedures for patient entry, whether randomized or nonrandomized, should be specified. Required information includes a description of the randomization process and the patient characteristics and stratification factors (if any) to be provided at the time of entry. Patients should be registered on study prior to beginning treatment.


7.2.8 Dose Modification for Adverse Events

The plan of dose change for adverse events should be stated for each study agent. Dose modification criteria should be described in terms of NCI Common Toxicity Criteria.

Protocol Authors should carefully review the Investigator's Brochure for all investigational agents to be sure that they have included all reasonable measures to monitor expected adverse events.

Instructions for reporting adverse events should be included in the protocol text.


7.2.9 Criteria for Response Assessment

The criteria for scoring responses should be included. These should be specific for both measurable and evaluable disease. Disease-specific criteria are often required and should clearly indicate acceptable means of measurement, i.e., CAT scans, radio-nuclide scans, ultrasound, etc.


7.2.10 Monitoring of Patients

Specify how patients will be followed for assessment of treatment adverse events and therapeutic effect. A table of follow-up parameters that incorporates the schedule is particularly useful. The DCTD Common Toxicity Criteria should be used for all DCTD-sponsored trials.


7.2.11 "Off-Study" Criteria

Criteria for terminating protocol treatment and/or removing a patient from treatment or from study should be specified.


7.2.12 Statistical Considerations

An adequate statistical section discusses the study design in relation to the objectives of the study and the plan for the evaluation of the data, specifically:

  • Method of randomization and stratification
  • Total sample size justified for adequate testing of primary and secondary hypotheses
  • Error levels (alpha and beta) in Phase 3 studies
  • Differences to be detected for comparative studies
  • Size of the confidence interval to be constructed around the estimated outcome
  • Estimated accrual rate and/or study duration, with supporting documentation
  • Stopping guidelines, including statistical and administrative procedures for monitoring the progress of the trial to implement early termination for very positive results, or for results sufficiently negative to preclude the eventual achievement of statistically significant positive results
  • Expected outcome parameters as appropriate (response rate, time to progression, survival times, etc.)
  • Primary endpoint for interim and final analysis
  • Clear specification of primary and secondary (e.g. subset) hypotheses
  • Maximum number of patients, and
  • Plan for analysis.


7.2.13 Records to be Kept

Specify the document on which each of the following is to be recorded, where it is to be sent, and on what schedule.

  • On-study information, including patient eligibility data and patient history
  • Flow sheets, or other forms for interim monitoring
  • Specialty forms for pathology, radiation, or surgery when required, and
  • Off-study summary sheet, including a final assessment by the treating physician.


7.2.14 Participation

All protocol treatments and observations will be made by investigator-physicians affiliated with a research base (refer to Section 3), and registered with CTEP. Under certain defined circumstances, it may be appropriate for interim treatments to be administered by certain physicians not registered with CTEP (other than trainees, who are assumed to be under the supervision of a registered investigator). In such cases, the protocol should state:

  • Precisely what responsibilities those physicians will assume, including response assessment, and adverse event reporting
  • How dose modifications will be decided and reported, and the mechanism by which data needed for evaluating adverse events and response will be transmitted to the registered investigator responsible for the patient, and
  • The intervals at which a patient should be evaluated by a physician-investigator at the research base. See Section 14 for further details concerning which physicians may actively participate in a clinical trial involving DCTD investigational agents.


7.2.15 Multicenter Trials

If an institution wishes to collaborate with other participating institutions in performing a CTEP-sponsored research protocol, then the following guidelines must be followed:

Responsibility of the Protocol Chair:

  • The Protocol Chair will be the single liaison with the CTEP Protocol and Information Office (PIO). The Protocol Chair is responsible for the coordination, development, submission and approval of the protocol as well as its subsequent amendments. The protocol must not be rewritten or modified by anyone other than the Protocol Chair. There will be only one version of the protocol and each participating institution will use that document. The Protocol Chair is responsible for assuring that all participating institutions are using the correct version of the protocol.
  • The Protocol Chair is responsible for the overall conduct of the study at all participating institutions and for monitoring its progress. All reporting requirements to CTEP are the responsibility of the Protocol Chair.
  • The Protocol Chair is responsible for the timely review of adverse events to assure safety of the patients.
  • The Protocol Chair will be responsible for the review of and timely submission of data for study analysis.

Responsibilities of the Coordinating Center

  • Each participating institution will have an appropriate assurance on file with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP), DHHS. The Coordinating Center is responsible for assuring that each participating institution has an OHRP assurance and must maintain copies of IRB approvals for each participating site.
  • Prior to the activation of the protocol at each participating institution, an OHRP form 310 (documentation of IRB approval) must be submitted to the CTEP PIO.
  • The Coordinating Center is responsible for central patient registration. The Coordinating Center is responsible for assuring that IRB approval has been obtained at each participating site prior to the first patient registration from that site.
  • The Coordinating Center is responsible for the preparation of all submitted data for review by the Protocol Chair.
  • The Coordinating Center will maintain documentation of adverse event reports. There are two options for adverse event reporting: (1) participating institutions may report directly to CTEP with a copy to the Coordinating Center; or (2) participating institutions report to the Coordinating Center who in turn report to CTEP. The Coordinating Center will submit adverse event reports to the Protocol Chair for timely review.
  • Audits may be accomplished in one of two ways: (1) source documents and research records for selected patients are brought from participating sites to the Coordinating Center for audit; or (2) selected patient records may be audited on-site at participating sites. If the NCI chooses to have an audit at the Coordinating Center, then the Coordinating Center is responsible for having all source documents, research records, all IRB approval documents, NCI Agent Accountability Record forms, patient registration lists, responsible assessments scans, x-rays, etc. available for the audit.

Inclusion of Multicenter Guidelines in the Protocol
The protocol must include the following minimum information:

  • The title page must include the name and address of each participating institution and the name, telephone number and e-mail address of the responsible investigator at each participating institution.
  • The Coordinating Center must be designated on the title page.
  • Central registration of patients is required. The procedures for registration must be stated in the protocol.
  • Data collection forms should be of a common format. Sample forms should be submitted with the protocol. The frequency and timing of data submission forms to the Coordinating Center should be stated.
  • Describe how adverse events will be reported from the participating institutions, either directly or indirectly to CTEP or through the Coordinating Center.

Agent Ordering
Except in very unusual circumstances, each participating institution will order DCTD-sponsored investigational agents directly from CTEP. Investigational agents may be ordered by a participating site only after the initial IRB approval for the site has been forwarded by the Coordinating Center to the CTEP PIO.


7.2.16 Laboratory Approaches to be Used for Ancillary Studies

This section should include a description of the technical approaches to be used for ancillary studies. The description does not need to be extremely detailed, but it should provide sufficient information for the reviewers to determine whether the approach is appropriate and the proper controls are included. For example, if flow cytometry is to be used for analysis of ploidy or S-phase fraction, the methods section should indicate whether frozen tissue or paraffin-embedded tissue will be used, the number of cells to be counted per sample, the control cells to be used, etc. Details are not required regarding reagents to be used for standard techniques; reference can be made to the technique. Some evidence should be presented regarding the investigator's experience with the techniques to be used.


7.3 Informed Consent

Each informed consent document must be protocol-specific and contain the elements required by Federal regulation. These regulations do not specify the language of the document but provide a list of elements that must be addressed in the text of the consent form. A checklist of these elements can be found in Appendix VII. CTEP will not approve a protocol if its informed consent form fails to address each of these elements adequately.

The use of a model informed consent by a research base can assure inclusion of the essential elements and permits tailoring of the protocol-specific elements to the needs of individual studies. Minor changes to the model informed consent form may be made by the individual institutions. However, any changes in risks or alternative procedures should be approved by the originator of the informed consent document. CTEP will not approve a protocol if its consent form fails to address each of these elements adequately.

Protocol authors should be certain that the description of expected adverse events is complete and balanced and reflective of the treatment plan to be used. Consult the Investigator's Brochure for information about expected adverse events for investigational agents and the package insert for commercially available agents. Adverse events of other modalities used in the study (e.g., radiotherapy, surgery) must also be described.

In response to concerns that many informed consent documents for cancer clinical trials have become complex, lengthy, and difficult to understand, NCI convened a working group of medical, ethical, communication, and consumer experts along with officials from OHRP and FDA. The result of this initiative is the development of guidelines for writing consent documents that are more understandable to prospective research participants. They are called the Recommendations for the Development of Informed Consent Documents for Cancer Clinical Trials, which include a fill-in-the-blank consent form template and four sample consent forms. The Recommendations have the potential to improve the quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials. We strongly urge you to use them as you write informed consent documents for cooperative group protocols. Also, you are encouraged to share the Recommendations with your IRBs. The templates are available as a working document on the CTEP website.


7.4 Protocol Templates

NCI staff have developed several model protocol templates. To facilitate rapid review, you are encouraged to utilize the NCI protocol templates.

Many clinical trials organizations have also devised model protocols and consents because the essential elements of a protocol are standard for a given class of studies, the elements of which can be altered to suit the needs of a particular study. The use of model documents is an effective way of ensuring a complete protocol. Those who use such models, however, should make certain that inappropriate "boilerplate" text does not get carried over to protocols where it makes little or no sense. Our experience is that disease-oriented background information and statistical sections (sample size estimates and stopping rules) are at greatest risk for the "word processor syndrome."


7.5 Protocol Checklist

A protocol checklist is available (Appendix VII, also consult NCI web site, http://www.cancer.gov/, under Conducting Clinical Trials, Guide to Understanding Informed Consent, Safeguards-Simplification of Informed Consent Documents: Templates) to assess if your protocol document is complete. The protocol checklist also includes NCI-approved boiler plate language for administrative and agent-specific issues.


Table of
Contents
Part A
1 2 3
Part B
4 5 7
Part C
7 8 9 10 11
Part D
12 13 14 15 16
Part E
17 18 19
Appendices


  Home   |   Contact   |   Privacy Notice   |   Accessibility National Cancer Institute   National Institutes of Health   Department of Health and Human Services   USA.gov